Keck and mithouard

Selling arrangements apply in principle only after a product has been imported. Reference is made to the Report for the Hearing for a fuller account of the facts of the case, the procedure and the written observations submitted to the Court, which are mentioned or discussed hereinafter only in so far as is necessary for the reasoning of the Court.

Provided that those conditions are fulfilled, the application of such rules to the sale of products from another Member State meeting the requirements laid down by that State is not by nature such as to prevent their access to the market or to impede access any more than it impedes the access of domestic products.

The Court distinguished the case from its earlier jurisprudence on the content or characteristics or the products concerned. Imola Streho, Free Movement of Goods: However, it is important to clarify it, in particular by reference to the case-law developed in the other fields of free movement.

By contrast, contrary to Keck and mithouard has previously been decided, […] national provisions restricting or prohibiting certain selling arrangements are not such as to hinder directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade between Member States within the meaning of Keck and mithouard Dassonville Keck and mithouard […], so long as those provisions apply to all relevant traders operating within the national territory and so long as they affect in the same manner, in law and in fact, the marketing of domestic products and of those from other Member States.

In response to this, the Court has meanwhile diminished the importance of the Keck-judgment, giving way to a refined Keck and mithouard. The aim of this law was to prevent retailers engaging in 'cut-throat competition' by dumping excess produce onto the market, and forcing competitors out of business.

In their defence Mr Keck and Mr Mithouard contended that a general prohibition on resale at a loss, as laid down by those provisions, is incompatible with Article 30 of the Treaty and with the principles of the free movement of persons, services, capital and free competition within the Community.

Other objections can be raised to Jacobs, including that Keck should be applied rigidly to dispose of complex and expensive empirical tests altogether, or that the burden of proof ought to be reversed from states to traders to afford Member States effective protection Furthermore, they indirectly affect the marketing of a product through consumers, for example because they cannot buy the product on certain days of the week or advertising for a product is subject to restrictions.

Whilst Keck faces empirical challenges, the relevant equation is simpler. Selling arrangements apply in principle only after a product has been imported. In some cases, it is difficult to distinguish selling arrangements from national rules relating to the characteristics of products, for the very reason that the existence of a restriction on trade is dependent on the method of application of a rule and its concrete effects.

By virtue of Article 30, quantitative restrictions on imports and all measures having equivalent effect are prohibited between Member States. Finally, it appears from the question submitted for a preliminary ruling that the national court seeks guidance as to the possible anti-competitive effects of the rules in question by reference exclusively to the foundations of the Community set out in Article 3 of the Treaty, without however making specific reference to any of the implementing rules of the Treaty in the field of competition.

The Court has consistently held that any measure which is capable of directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, hindering intra-Community trade constitutes a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction. This complexity results, in particular, in a tendency on the part of the Court to refer back to the national court the responsibility of ascertaining the character and scope of the rule in question.

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Arrangements for use also affect the marketing of a product only indirectly through their effects on the purchasing behaviour of consumers. But the question remains whether such a possibility is sufficient to characterize the legislation in question as a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on imports.

By virtue of Article 30, quantitative restrictions on imports and all measures having equivalent effect are prohibited between Member States.

This problem appears to be even greater as many national measures examined by the Court from the perspective of the free movement of goods can also be treated as restrictions on the other freedoms of movement.

A situation where only a marginal possibility for using a product remains because of a particularly restrictive rule on use is to be regarded as preventing access to the market.

Keck and mithouard essays

A French competition law prohibited retail of products for prices below that which they had been purchased wholesale. The Court has consistently held that any measure which is capable of directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, hindering intra-Community trade constitutes a measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction.

Reference is made to the Report for the Hearing for a fuller account of the facts of the case, the procedure and the written observations submitted to the Court, which are mentioned or discussed hereinafter only in so far as is necessary for the reasoning of the Court.

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

1 Colum. J. Eur. L. () Jan Vanhamme. Researcher, Institute for European Law, Catholic University, Leuven, Belgium. Frenchmen Bernard Keck and Daniel Mithouard had broken French law by reselling products at prices lower than their purchase price.

Keck and Mithouard

Judgment of the Court of Justice, Keck and Mithouard, Joined cases C/91 and C/91 (24 November ) Text A precedent-setting judgment on the free movement of goods. Conclusion sentences for research papers human geography essay constitution du 4 octobre dissertation proposal. Literarische essay Literarische essay essay about being the middle child against empire enemy essay its megamachine columbia autobiographical essay spyder sides dissertation critical essays king lear essay analysis brothers and keepers our time wideman drm essay school related.

The case dealt with criminal proceedings brought by the French government against Keck and Mithouard, on the basis that the latter were reselling products in an unaltered state at prices lower than their purchase price, something that is prohibited by French law.

Keck and Mithouard Supervisor Peter Gjörtler Field of study EC Law Spring Contents SUMMARY 1 PREFACE 4 ABBREVIATIONS 5 1 INTRODUCTION 6 2 A SHORT OVERVIEW ON THE RULES REGARDING THE Keck is an exception from the main rule in Article 28, and that should mean that it.

Keck and Mithouard Supervisor Peter Gjörtler Field of study EC Law Spring Contents SUMMARY 1 PREFACE 4 ABBREVIATIONS 5 1 INTRODUCTION 6 2 A SHORT OVERVIEW ON THE RULES REGARDING THE Keck is an exception from the main rule in Article 28, and that should mean that it.

Keck and Mithouard Keck and mithouard
Rated 0/5 based on 10 review
CURIA - List of results